Skip to main content

What is Equivalence partitioning

Equivalence partitioning is a systematic process that identifies, on the basis of whatever information is available, a set of interesting classes of input conditions to be tested, where each class is representative of (or covers) a large set of other possible tests. If partitioning is applied to the product under test, the product is going to behave in much the same way for all members of the class.

The aim is to minimize the number of test cases required to cover these input conditions.

There are two distinct steps. The first is to identify the equivalence classes (ECs) and the second is to identify the test cases.

(1) Identifying equivalence classes

For each external input:

(i) If the input specifies a range of valid values, define one valid EC (within the range) and two invalid Ecs (one outside each end of the range).

Example: If the input requires a month in the range of 1-12, define one valid EC for months 1 through 12 and two invalid ECs (month<1>12).

(ii) If the input specifies the number (N) of valid values, define one valid EC and two invalid ECs (none, and more than N).

Example: If the input requires the titles of at least three but no more than eight books, then define one valid EC and two invalid ECs (<3>8 books).

(iii) If the input specifies a set of valid values, define one valid EC (within the set) and one invalid EC (outside the set).

Example: If the input requires one of the names TOM, DICK, or HARRY, then define one valid EC (using one of the valid names) and one invalid EC (using the name JOE).

(iv) If there is reason to believe that the program handles each valid input differently, then define one valid EC per valid input.

(v) If the input specifies a “must be” situation, define one valid EC and one invalid EC.

Example: If the first character of the input must be numeric, then define one valid EC where the first character is a number and one invalid EC where the first character is not a number.

(vi) If there is reason to believe that elements in an EC are not handled in an identical manner by the program, subdivide the EC into smaller ECs.


(2) Identifying test cases

(i) Assign a unique number to each EC.
(ii) Until all valid ECs have been covered by test cases, write a new test case covering as many of the uncovered ECs as possible.
(iii) Until all invalid Ecs have been covered by test cases, write a test case that covers one, and only one, of the uncovered invalid ECs.
(iv) If multiple invalid ECs are tested in the same test case, some of those tests may never be executed because the first test may mask other tests or terminate execution of the test case.

Equivalence partitioning significantly reduces the number of input conditions to be tested by identifying classes of conditions that are equivalent to many other conditions. It does not test combinations of input conditions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manual testing - Brief Summary

Manual testing is a type of software testing in which testers execute test cases without the use of automation tools or scripts. Instead, testers follow a series of predefined steps to verify that a software application or system functions correctly and meets its requirements. Manual testing is an essential part of the software testing process and is typically performed alongside automated testing, where applicable. Here are some key aspects of manual testing: Test Case Design : Testers create test cases based on the software's requirements, specifications, and design documents. These test cases outline the steps to be followed, the expected results, and any necessary preconditions. Test Execution: Testers manually execute the test cases by interacting with the software just like a user would. They input data, navigate through the user interface, and observe the system's behavior. Exploratory Testing: In addition to predefined test cases, manual testers often perform ex...

What is Installation testing?

Installation testing is done to verify whether the hardware and software are installed and configured properly. This will ensure that all the system components were used during the testing process. This Installation testing will look out the testing for a high volume data, error messages as well as security testing

Explain Peer Review in Software Testing

It is an alternative form of Testing, where some colleagues were invited to examine your work products for defects and improvement opportunities. Some Peer review approaches are, Inspection – It is a more systematic and rigorous type of peer review. Inspections are more effective at finding defects than are informal reviews.Ex : In Motorola’s Iridium project nearly 80% of the defects were detected through inspections where only 60% of the defects were detected through informal reviews. Team Reviews – It is a planned and structured approach but less formal and less rigorous comparing to Inspections. Walkthrough – It is an informal review because the work product’s author describes it to some colleagues and asks for suggestions. Walkthroughs are informal because they typically do not follow a defined procedure, do not specify exit criteria, require no management reporting, and generate no metrics. Pair Programming – In Pair Programming, two developers work together on the same program at...